ArticleCureus2023
Early Clinical Outcomes in Patients of Carcinoma Cervix Treated With Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Carcinoma cervix is one of the major cancers affecting Indian women. Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is the standard of care in the treatment of carcinoma cervix. We aimed to study the outcomes and toxicity profile of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), an advanced modality of radiation delivery when used to treat patients with carcinoma cervix. Materials and methods Patients of carcinoma cervix belonging to FIGO (The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stages IB2- IVA were recruited into the study. The patients were treated with VMAT to an EBRT (External Beam Radiation Therapy) dose of 50.4Gy in 28 fractions, which was followed by a brachytherapy schedule of 8Gy for each fraction to point A for three fractions. Toxicities were monitored weekly during the course of treatment and thereafter at every follow-up visit. A response assessment CECT (Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography) scan was done three months after treatment and the response was recorded using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) criteria. Results Sixty-four patients were available for analysis and most of the patients belonged to stage IIB (50.3%) followed by stage IIIB (28.5%). The complete response rate was 90.6% at three months and at a median follow-up of 12 months, the overall survival was 100% and disease-free survival was 89.1%. An analysis of clinically significant toxicities (grade 2 or worse) showed that diarrhea was the most common (20.3%) followed by proctitis (14%) and anemia (9.3%). Conclusion The results of the study established that volumetric modulated arc therapy is an acceptable modality of treatment of carcinoma cervix with an attractive toxicity profile. However, longer follow-ups will provide valuable information regarding the long-term disease control and late toxicities of the treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.