Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37822644›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2023

A PEEK into carbon fiber: A practical guide for high performance composite polymeric implants for orthopaedic oncology.

Marilee J Clunk, Marcos R Gonzalez, Hayley M Denwood, Joseph O Werenski, Alisha Sodhi, Brett A Hoffman, Nelson Merchan, Santiago A Lozano-Calderon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marilee J ClunkMusculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Marcos R GonzalezMusculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Hayley M DenwoodMusculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Joseph O WerenskiMusculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Alisha SodhiMusculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Brett A HoffmanUniversity of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences Toledo, OH, 43614, USA.
Nelson MerchanMusculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Santiago A Lozano-CalderonMusculoskeletal Oncology Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USBoston University · USUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The use of carbon fiber implants in orthopaedic oncology has increased within recent years. The most widely used type of polymer is carbon fiber polyether ether ketone (CF-PEEK). Its radiolucency enables targeted radiotherapy and artifact-free tumor surveillance, which provides major advantages over metallic hardware. We aim to summarize the unique benefits within orthopaedic oncology, clinical pitfalls, and recent advancements. Methods: Four representative patient cases from a single tertiary academic medical center were treated with carbon fiber implants (n = 2 nails, n = 2 plates) from 2021 to 2022. Results: There were no adverse events noted during intraoperative implantation or postoperative follow up. All patients reported improvements in pain and no difficulties in ambulation. There were no instances of catastrophic failure or implant loosening. Conclusion: CF implants offer a diverse array of advantages regarding its radiolucency, low scatter density, and bioinert profile. Nonetheless, further research is required to understand the long-term surgical outcomes and robustness of CF implants. Multi institutional trials could address important aspects of durability and stability over extended periods, feasibility and ease-of-use for different anatomical sites and bone quality, as well as cost-effectiveness in post-operative imaging, healthcare resource utilization, and revision rates. Providing orthopaedic surgeons with valuable insight will enable thorough clinically supported, informed decision making regarding optimal use of implants.

Indexed as

Carbon fiber implantsComposite polymerOrthopaedic oncologyPractical guide

Identifiers

PMID37822644
PMCPMC10562613
OpenAlexW4387191109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.