ArticleHeliyon2023
Which trunk muscle parameter is the best predictor for physical function in older adults?
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Smartphone-Based Field Assessment of Trunk Stability and Its Relationship With Whole-Body Balance in Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Identification of Predictors of Adaptability in Older Adults Based on the Roy Adaptation Model Using Machine Learning.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Association between maximal lower leg strength and static and dynamic balance as well as gait velocity in older adults.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Trunk Muscle Mass in Older Adults Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis: A Scoping Review.JMA journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite preliminary evidence demonstrating the relevance of trunk muscle strength for physical function in older adults, it is not clear which muscle-related trunk parameter is the best predictor for physical functions. Therefore, this study aimed to compare trunk muscle morphology or strength parameters regarding their predictive ability for physical functions. Methods: Seventy-four older adults (38 men, 36 women, mean age 76.85 years) were tested for maximum absolute and relative isokinetic trunk flexion and extension strength, trunk lean mass, and trunk muscle quality. Functional assessment included normal and fast walking speed, repeated sit-to-stand transfer, timed up and go, and postural sway during a closed-feet and a semi-tandem stance adjusted for body height. Pearson's correlations were used to compare relationship between trunk strength adjusted and unadjusted for body weight to physical functions. Linear regression analysis including sex and age as co-variables was performed between trunk muscle and functional test parameters. Results: Relative back extension strength was the most consistent significant predictor for all physical function tests (p = 0.004-0.04) except for postural sway. Relative trunk flexion strength was related to normal walking speed (p = 0.024). Trunk lean mass was related to timed up and go performance (p = 0.024). Conclusion: Relative back extension strength is associated with better performance in nearly all standard tests for physical function in older adults, while trunk flexion strength and lean mass seem to play a minor role. Our findings emphasize the importance of trunk muscle strength, especially the back extensor muscles, for physical function in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.