ArticlePhysics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994)2023
Near-surface wind variability over spatiotemporal scales relevant to plume tracking insects.
Article in Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Odor tracking in flyingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Advances and Prospects in Odour-based Management of Filth Flies.Journal of chemical ecology · 2026Review
- Wind history shapes olfactory search response in free flyingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Odor tracking in flyingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Wind gates olfaction-driven search states in free flight.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Odour source distance is predictable from a time history of odour statistics for large scale outdoor plumes.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Near-surface wind variability over spatiotemporal scales relevant to plume tracking insects.Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Odor plume tracking is important for many organisms, and flying insects have served as popular model systems for studying this behavior both in field and laboratory settings. The shape and statistics of the airborne odor plumes that insects follow are largely governed by the wind that advects them. Prior atmospheric studies have investigated aspects of microscale wind patterns with an emphasis on characterizing pollution dispersion, enhancing weather prediction models, and for assessing wind energy potential. Here, we aim to characterize microscale wind dynamics through the lens of short-term ecological functions by focusing on spatial and temporal scales most relevant to insects actively searching for odor sources. We collected and compared near-surface wind data across three distinct environments (sage steppe, forest, and urban) in Northern Nevada. Our findings show that near-surface wind direction variability decreases with increasing wind speeds and increases in environments with greater surface complexity. Across environments, there is a strong correlation between the variability in the wind speed (i.e., turbulence intensity) and wind direction (i.e., standard deviation in wind direction). In some environments, the standard deviation in the wind direction varied as much as 15°-75° on time scales of 1-10 min. We draw insight between our findings and previous plume tracking experiments to provide a general intuition for future field research and guidance for wind tunnel design. Our analysis suggests a hypothesis that there may be an ideal range of wind speeds and environment complexity in which insects will be most successful when tracking odor plumes over long distances.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.