Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37822567›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2023

Study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled pilot study on decompressive laparotomy vs. decompressive craniectomy for intractable intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury: The SCALPEL study.

Benny Kölbel, Alexander Novotny, Arnulf Willms, Victoria Kehl, Bernhard Meyer, Uwe-Max Mauer, Sandro M Krieg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05115929 (Standard Craniectomy Against Laparotomy for the Treatment of Traumatic Rise in Intracranial Pressure and the Effect on Long-term Outcome), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05115929 narecruitingnot on this map

Standard Craniectomy Against Laparotomy for the Treatment of Traumatic Rise in Intracranial Pressure and the Effect on Long-term Outcome

TypeinterventionalSponsorTechnical University of MunichRan2022 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsTraumatic Brain InjuriesArmsDecompressive Laparotomy, Decompressive Craniectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Benny KölbelDepartment of Surgery, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Germany.
Alexander NovotnyDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Arnulf WillmsDepartment of Surgery, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Hamburg, Germany.
Victoria KehlMünchner Studienzentrum, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard MeyerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Uwe-Max MauerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Germany.
Sandro M KriegDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
TUM Klinikum · DEBundeswehrkrankenhaus · DEBundeswehrkrankenhaus · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is the ultimate intervention to lower intracranial pressure (ICP) following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, this intervention is associated with considerable adverse events and a higher proportion of survivors with poor functional outcomes. Research question: In a multicompartment system ICP is associated with intraabdominal pressure (IAP) due to cerebral venous outflow from the brain. This is the rationale for decompressive laparotomy (DL) to control ICP after TBI as reported by experimental and retrospective clinical data. The safety profile of DL is superior to DC. This study aims to randomly assign patients with intractable high ICP after severe TBI to DL or DC. Material and methods: Among other inclusion criteria, ICP must be above 20 mmHg (1-12 h) despite sedation and all other measures according to current guidelines. The primary outcome is the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale assessed after twelve months. Further secondary outcome measures are compartmental pressure values, complications, etc. After 20 initial patients, results will be reviewed by the ethics committees and safety monitoring board to decide on the enrolment of 80 additional patients. Results: The study is designed to provide not only high-quality prospective data for the first time on this treatment approach, its two-stage design (20 + 80 pts) also provides maximum patient safety. This protocol conforms with the SPIRIT 2013 Statement. Ethics approval was granted by our but also 5 other university ethics committees (registration 473/18S). Conclusion: Registration was performed prior to study initiation in November 2021 (registration number NCT05115929).

Indexed as

Decompressive craniectomyDecompressive laparotomyIntracranial pressureTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID37822567
PMCPMC10562836
OpenAlexW4387057407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.