ArticleFood chemistry. Molecular sciences2023
Reproducibility of next-generation-sequencing-based analysis of a CRISPR/Cas9 genome edited oil seed rape.
Article in Food chemistry. Molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of SNV Detection Methods for Market Control of Food Products from New Genomic Techniques.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Use of Deep Sequencing to Evaluate Transitions in Microbial Communities in StrandedInternational journal of microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next-generation-sequencing (NGS) becomes increasingly important for laboratories tasked with the detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food, feed and seeds. Its implementation into standardized workflows demands reliable intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility. Here, we analyze the reproducibility of short- and long-read targeted NGS and long-read whole genome sequencing (WGS) data between three independent laboratories. Replicate samples were submitted for sequencing and comparatively analyzed. The targeted-NGS-samples consisted of oil seed rape (OSR) sampled from a commodity shipment spiked with a genome edited (GE) OSR and the WGS-samples consisted of leaf material from the GMOs' parental line. All laboratories delivered highly reproducible high-quality targeted NGS data with little variation. The detection of GMO-related sequences works well regardless of the facility, while the mapping to the complex genome is superior using long read data. Long read WGS is currently not suitable for routine use in enforcement laboratories, due to a large inter-laboratory variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.