Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37822533›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2023

A robust semi-automatic delineation workflow using denoised diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging for response assessment of patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Robin den Boer, Kelvin Ng Wei Siang, Mandy Yuen, Alicia Borggreve, Ingmar Defize, Astrid van Lier, Jelle Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg, Stella Mook, Gert Meijer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robin den BoerUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kelvin Ng Wei SiangErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mandy YuenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alicia BorggreveUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ingmar DefizeUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Astrid van LierUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jelle RuurdaUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Richard van HillegersbergUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Surgery, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stella MookUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gert MeijerUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) can be prognostic for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCRT) in patients with esophageal cancer. However, manual tumor delineation is labor intensive and subjective. Furthermore, noise in DW-MRI images will propagate into the corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) signal. In this study a workflow is investigated that combines a denoising algorithm with semi-automatic segmentation for quantifying ADC changes. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with esophageal cancer who underwent nCRT before esophagectomy were included. One baseline and five weekly DW-MRI scans were acquired for every patient during nCRT. A self-supervised learning denoising algorithm, Patch2Self, was used to denoise the DWI-MRI images. A semi-automatic delineation workflow (SADW) was next developed and compared with a manually adjusted workflow (MAW). The agreement between workflows was determined using the Dice coefficients and Brand Altman plots. The prognostic value of ADC Results: The median Dice coefficient between the SADW and MAW was 0.64 (interquartile range 0.20). For the MAW, the c-statistic for predicting pCR was 0.80 (95% confidence interval (CI):0.56-1.00). The SADW showed a c-statistic of 0.84 (95%CI:0.63-1.00) after denoising. No statistically significant differences in c-statistics were observed between the workflows or after applying denoising. Conclusions: The SADW resulted in non-inferior prognostic value for pCR compared to the more laborious MAW, allowing broad scale applications. The effect of denoising on the prognostic value for pCR needs to be investigated in larger cohorts.

Indexed as

Automatic workflowdiffusion weighted MRIEsophageal cancerImaging biomarkerNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyResponse prediction

Identifiers

PMID37822533
PMCPMC10562188
OpenAlexW4386270684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.