Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37822495›Full record

ReviewiScience2023

Evaluating the resolution of conventional optical microscopes through point spread function measurement.

Weihan Hou, Yangjie Wei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Weihan HouKey Laboratory of Intelligent Computing in Medical Image, Ministry of Education, College of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Wenhua Street 3, Shenyang 110819, China.
Yangjie WeiKey Laboratory of Intelligent Computing in Medical Image, Ministry of Education, College of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Wenhua Street 3, Shenyang 110819, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the imaging process of conventional optical microscopy, the primary factor hindering microscope resolution is the energy diffusion of incident light, most directly described by the point spread function (PSF). Therefore, accurate calculation and measurement of PSF are essential for evaluating and enhancing imaging resolution. Currently, there are various methods to obtain PSFs, each with different advantages and disadvantages suitable for different scenarios. To provide a comprehensive analysis of PSF-obtaining methods, this study classifies them into four categories based on different acquisition principles and analyzes their advantages and disadvantages, starting from the propagation property of light in optical physics. Finally, two PSF-obtaining methods are proposed based on mathematical modeling and deep learning, demonstrating their effectiveness through experimental results. This study compares and analyzes these results, highlighting the practical applications of image deblurring.

Indexed as

Optical imagingOpticsPhysics

Identifiers

PMID37822495
PMCPMC10562796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.