ArticleCureus2023
Proposing a Questionnaire for Assessing English Proficiency Among Japanese Medical Students: Current Perspectives and a Pilot Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Japanese medical schools have made advances in terms of English and Medical English teaching in the past decade, in keeping with their importance in medical communication and research. English skills and proficiency levels differ across different institutions due to the variable adoption of general teaching requirements. A limitation in assessing English proficiency among Japanese medical students continues to exist due to the lack of standardized testing requirements. Methods A new questionnaire was developed by faculty members and medical students. Areas of importance were: demographics, proficiency and confidence ratings, history of learning and usage, duration of usage, perceived importance, and improvement goals. The final draft of the constructed questionnaire contained 21 questions in total. The questionnaire was administered over a three-month period in incremental order of enrollment through a digital online platform. Results A total of 133 students, 64 (48.1%) males and 69 (51.9%) females, participated. The average age was 23.7 ± 4.8 years. Based on an incremental Likert scale, respondents rated themselves as 1.0 ± 0.8 for English proficiency and 0.5 ± 0.7 for Medical English proficiency. The confidence level for English medical discussions was 0.2 ± 0.6 on a similar scale. Students on average attended 18.0 ± 30.0 classes per year and presented medical materials in English around 1.7 ± 1.7 times in total. The English language was used for 2.1 ± 6.3 hours per week in personal settings and 0.5 ± 1.7 hours per week in professional settings. Conclusions The proposed questionnaire was able to give valuable information about language skills and proficiency levels, but would require an incentive for improved participation. The pilot analysis showed that English and Medical English proficiency levels remain low with limited opportunities for using English in some areas within Japan. It may be beneficial to provide Japanese medical students with more occasions where they can use or practice their English skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.