ArticleSAGE open nursing
Development, Validity and Reliability of Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Nursing Students.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychometric Properties of Instruments Measuring Health Sciences Students' Perceptions of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: A Systematic Review.Nursing open · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of station number and duration time per station on the reliability of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Perceptions of Nursing Undergraduates Regarding Their Clinical Placements: A Qualitative Interpretative Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Educational interventions are effective in improving students' ethical and moral outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Global Insights and Key Trends in Objective Structured Clinical Examination Research Related to Residency Training: A Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of dental education · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the objective structured clinical examination in the assessment of nuclear medicine residency training.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- From Task Executor to Decision-Maker: Competency Transfer in Oncology Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Nurses-A Descriptive Phenomenological Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Academic performance and anxiety in the evaluation of health science undergraduate students using osce: a pre- and post-covid-19 cohort study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Design, implementation, and comprehensive evaluation of the specialized teachings of health information technology students.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- The Storm Within: Exploring First-Year Nursing Students' Experiences of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The adoption of measurement instruments such as the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is essential to assess clinical competencies in nursing students. Objective: The purpose of this study is to develop an OSCE, analyze its validity and reliability in the nursing curriculum and measure self-assessment, stress and satisfaction. Methods: The observational validation study of a measurement instrument was carried out in two phases: the design and development of the OSCE and validity and reliability analysis. Results: A total of 118 students participated in the study. Ten scenarios were designed that incorporated six competency components extracted from the curriculum. Good results were obtained in face validity, content validity (CVI .82-.95), criterion validity (r = .71, p < .001), and reliability (α Cronbach .84). Satisfaction and stress scores were high, and self-assessment scores were lower than the scores obtained. Conclusion: A rigorously designed OSCE provides a reliable and valid method for assessing the clinical competence of nursing students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.