Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37822285›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Rapid Assessment of Subjective Hearing Complaints With a Modified Version of the Tinnitus and Hearing Survey.

Alyssa Davidson, Gregory Ellis, LaGuinn P Sherlock, Jaclyn Schurman, Douglas Brungart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alyssa DavidsonAudiology and Speech Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, National Military Audiology and Speech Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9642-2475
Gregory EllisAudiology and Speech Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, National Military Audiology and Speech Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
LaGuinn P SherlockAudiology and Speech Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, National Military Audiology and Speech Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jaclyn SchurmanAudiology and Speech Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, National Military Audiology and Speech Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Douglas BrungartAudiology and Speech Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, National Military Audiology and Speech Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing difficulties are frequently reported by patients in audiology clinics, including patients with normal audiometric thresholds. However, because all individuals experience some difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments, it can be difficult to assess hearing complaints objectively across patients. Normative values help address this issue by providing an objective cutoff score for determining what is or is not clinically significant. The goal of this study was to establish normative values for the four-item hearing subscale of the Tinnitus and Hearing Survey (THS-H). Respondents completing the THS-H rate the level of difficulty understanding speech in the situations most commonly reported as being difficult: in the presence of noise, on TV or in movies, soft voices and group conversations. In this study, 22,583 US Service Members (SMs) completed the THS-H using an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (not a problem) to 10 (a very big problem). Responses to the four items were summed to produce values between 0 and 40. The distribution of the final scores was analyzed based on severity of hearing loss, age, and sex. Only 5% of SMs with clinically normal hearing scored above 27, so this score was selected as a cutoff for "clinically significant hearing problems." Due to its ease of administration and interpretation, the THS-H could be a useful tool for identifying patients with subjective hearing difficulty warranting audiological evaluation and management.

Indexed as

DeafnessHearing LossSpeech PerceptionTinnitusHearingHearing TestsHumansSurveys and Questionnaireshearingmilitary medicinesurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37822285
PMCPMC10571680
OpenAlexW4387563356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.