Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37822002›Full record

ArticleNeurological research and practice2023

Frequency and satisfaction of conventional and complementary or alternative therapies for neuromuscular disorders.

Lene Änne Böhne, Corinna Wirner, Benedikt Schoser, Carsten Schröter, Petra Baum

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lene Änne BöhneDepartment and Outpatient Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig (UKL), Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. lene.boehne@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9604-1541
Corinna WirnerDepartment of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Ziemssenstraße 1, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Benedikt SchoserDepartment of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Ziemssenstraße 1, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Carsten SchröterDepartment of Neurology, Hoher Meißner Clinic, Hardtstraße 36, 37242, Bad Sooden-Allendorf, Germany.
Petra BaumDepartment and Outpatient Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig (UKL), Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELeipzig University · DELeipzig University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCausal therapies are not yet available for most neuromuscular diseases. Additionally, data on the use of complementary or alternative therapies (CAM) in patients groups with a variety of different neuromuscular diseases are rare. This retrospective cross-sectional study aims to record the frequency of use and satisfaction of conventional therapies and complementary or alternative medicine (CAM) in patients with neuromuscular disorders in order to compare them afterwards.

methodsPatients from the University of Leipzig (Department and Outpatient Department of Neurology), the Friedrich-Baur-Institute (Department of Neurology), the Hoher Meißner Clinic (Department of Neurology) and the German Society for Muscular Diseases (DGM e.V.) were included. The focus of this study has been on patients with chronic neuromuscular diseases. Our data are based on standardised questionnaires in analogue form from three German neuromuscular centres and in digital form from the official website of the German Society for Muscular Diseases. Therapy satisfaction was assessed with the Patient Evaluation of Global Response (PEGR) ranking scale (very satisfactory + 2 to very unsatisfactory - 2).

resultsOf 192 questionnaires analysed, the most common diagnoses were spinal muscular atrophy (n = 42; 21.9%), muscular dystrophies (n = 41; 21.4%) and myotonic dystrophies (n = 38; 19.8%). More than half (n = 112; 58.3%) used both conventional and CAM treatments. Physiotherapy (n = 165) was used most frequently within all treatments with conventional manual (PEGR 1.25, p = 0.013; CI 95%) and aquatic therapy (PEGR 1.3, p = 0.038) showing significantly higher satisfaction compared to therapy on training equipment. Less-used therapies such as psychotherapy (n = 53; PEGR 1.2) were also satisfactory. Within CAM, massages (n = 96) were the most reported and meditation (PEGR 1.5) was best rated. Massage therapy was significantly more satisfactory than progressive muscle relaxation (p = 0.003) and chiropractic treatment (p = 0.036). Chiropractic treatment (PEGR - 0.1) was rated most negatively. No significant differences were found between the group of conventional therapies and CAM users regarding social and disease-dependent factors.

conclusionsTreatment with conventional therapy (manual, aquatic therapy) and some CAM therapies can be recommended if adequately indicated.

Indexed as

CAMChronic neuromuscular diseasesSymptomatic therapies for neuromuscular diseases

Identifiers

PMID37822002
PMCPMC10568802
OpenAlexW4387520904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.