Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37821932›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2023

Implementation determinants of physical activity interventions in primary health care settings using the TICD framework: a systematic review.

Catarina Santos Silva, Cristina Godinho, Jorge Encantado, Bruno Rodrigues, Eliana V Carraça, Pedro J Teixeira, Marlene Nunes Silva

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. First iteration of a User-Centered Design process to develop an in-bed leg press.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catarina Santos SilvaCIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal. catarinasilva@fmh.ulisboa.pt.
Cristina GodinhoPrograma Nacional Para a Promoção da Atividade Física, Direção-Geral da Saúde, Lisboa, Portugal.
Jorge EncantadoCIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Bruno RodriguesCIAFEL, Faculdade de Desporto da Universidade Do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Eliana V CarraçaCIDEFES, Centro de Investigação em Desporto, Educação Física, Exercício e Saúde, Universidade Lusófona, Lisboa, Portugal.
Pedro J TeixeiraCIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Marlene Nunes SilvaPrograma Nacional Para a Promoção da Atividade Física, Direção-Geral da Saúde, Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranslation into practice of effective physical activity interventions in primary care is difficult, due to a complex interaction of implementation determinants. We aimed to identify implementation barriers and facilitators of four primary care interventions: physical activity assessment, counselling, prescription, and referral.

methodsA systematic review of qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies published since 2016 was conducted. The "Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases" (TICD) framework was adapted to extract and synthesize barriers and facilitators.

resultsSixty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Barriers (n = 56) and facilitators (n = 55) were identified across seven domains, related to characteristics of the intervention, individual factors of the implementers and receivers, organizational factors, and political and social determinants. The five most frequently reported determinants were: professionals' knowledge and skills; intervention feasibility/compatibility with primary health care routine; interventions' cost and financial incentives; tools and materials; and professionals' cognitions and attitudes. "Social, political and legal factors" domain was the least reported. Physical activity counselling, prescription, and referral were influenced by determinants belonging to all the seven domains.

conclusionThe implementation of physical activity interventions in primary care is influenced by a broader range of determinants. Barriers and facilitators related with health professionals, intervention characteristics, and available resources were the most frequently reported. A deep understanding of the local context, with particularly emphasis on these determinants, should be considered when preparing an intervention implementation, in order to contribute for designing tailored implementation strategies and optimize the interventions' effectiveness.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPrimary Health CareChronic DiseaseHumansBarriersDeterminants of implementationFacilitatorsPhysical activity interventionsPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID37821932
PMCPMC10568782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.