Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37821899›Full record

Trial reportTrials2023

Factors that influence women's enrolment and ongoing participation in a partially decentralised randomised controlled dermatology trial: a qualitative interview study with participants in the SAFA (Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne) trial.

Cherish Boxall, Susanne Renz, Zina Eminton, Jacqueline Nuttall, Alan Saji, Charlotte Cluff, Christopher Wilcox, Ingrid Muller, Alison M Layton, Irene Soulsby and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cherish BoxallSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. c.e.m.boxall@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7850-233X
Susanne RenzSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Zina EmintonSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Jacqueline NuttallSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Alan SajiFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Charlotte CluffFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Christopher WilcoxPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Ingrid MullerPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Alison M LaytonSkin Research Centre, University of York, York, UK.
Irene SoulsbySouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Miriam SanterPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
University of Southampton · GBNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of decentralised clinical trials (which bring trials to patients through remote processes and technology versus central on-site visits) has been thought to be a potential solution to common recruitment and retention barriers. However, there is a lack of evidence to understand the experiences, needs and preferences of the public to inform trial methodologies that appeal to different populations. We report participant experiences of SAFA, a partially decentralised randomised clinical trial, to inform the methodology used in future dermatology trials that aim to appeal to women aged 18 and over.

methodsParticipants of the SAFA (Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne) trial were invited to take part in a qualitative semi-structured interview to explore their experience and perspectives of taking part in the trial. Questions focused on their experience of using decentralised methods to access and enrol in the trial (e.g. social media advertising), in addition to the decentralised trial visit and data collection methods used throughout. Interviews were conducted remotely, recorded, and transcribed. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsTwelve SAFA participants (all women, age range 22-36 years) were interviewed. Initially, participants were influenced to enrol by trusted online information, the feeling of validation the trial provided, and the convenience and flexibility offered by the decentralised methods and research staff made participants feel valued and enabled them to engage in the trial with minimal interference to existing commitments. SAFA participants were generally accepting of trial demands, such as the text-heavy paperwork and on-site visits for blood collection and highlighted several areas relevant for trial conduct going forwards including where decentralised methods may (and may not) be accepted and how trial accessibility and understanding could be improved.

conclusionsThe study has shown that decentralised methods used by responsive and approachable staff were widely accepted in the SAFA trial. Interviewees found the methods adopted in the SAFA trial helped the trial to fit with their needs and promoted a sense of feeling valued that encouraged ongoing trial engagement. Decentralised methods should be considered favourably when designing a dermatology trial as they can potentially enhance both recruitment and retention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 12892056. Registered on October 15, 2018.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisDermatologyAdolescentAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansQualitative ResearchSpironolactoneYoung AdultSpironolactoneDecentralisedDermatologyExperienceHybridQualitativeRecruitmentRetentionTrial

Identifiers

PMID37821899
PMCPMC10568833
OpenAlexW4387519982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.