Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37821863›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Shifting the gaze on implementation: examining the association between the implementation of tobacco control laws and prevalence of tobacco using data from a nationally representative survey.

Pragati B Hebbar, Upendra Bhojani, Onno van Schayck, Giridhara Babu, Vivek Dsouza, Gera E Nagelhout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Countering Tobacco Industry Interference: A Policy Brief on Strengthening the WHO FCTC Article 5.3 Adoption in India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pragati B HebbarInstitute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. pragati@iphindia.org.
Upendra BhojaniInstitute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Onno van SchayckDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Giridhara BabuEpidemiology, IIPH-H, Bangalore Campus, Public Health Foundation of India, IIPH-H, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Vivek DsouzaInstitute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Gera E NagelhoutDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHI/17/1/503346DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CRC/20/1/600007Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTobacco use and the associated health burden is a cause of concern in India and globally. Despite several tobacco control policies in place, their sub-optimal and variable implementation across Indian states has remained a concern. Studies evaluating the real-world implementation of policies such as Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (COTPA) or National Tobacco Control Program (NTCP) in India and its association with reductions in tobacco use are limited. In this paper, we analyse data from a nationally representative survey to examine how policy implementation is associated with the tobacco use prevalence in India.

methodsWe analysed data from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS 2016-17) India using multivariable logistic regression. The dependent variables were the use of smoked tobacco, smokeless tobacco, and tobacco in any form. The independent variables were proxies of implementation of the COTPA and the NTCP. We followed a step-wise backward elimination technique to reach the best fit models.

resultsPeople exposed to no-smoking signages had lower odds of using tobacco (OR = 0.70, p < 0.001). People exposed to second-hand smoke (OR = 1.51, p < 0.001) and tobacco product advertisements (OR = 1.23, p < 0.001) had greater odds of using tobacco. Exposure to tobacco advertisements was associated with higher odds of using smokeless tobacco (OR = 1.23, p < 0.001), and smoked (OR = 1.33, p < 0.001) forms of tobacco.

conclusionWe find significant association between the implementation of tobacco control laws/programs and tobacco use in India. Our findings highlight the potential that policy implementation holds in reducing population-level tobacco use thus drawing attention towards the implementation phase of policies. The findings have implications on prioritising enforcement of specific tobacco control measures such as smokefree laws, modifying COTPA signages to encompass all tobacco products including against smokeless tobacco use and strengthening indirect advertising restrictions. Future research could focus on developing and validating predictors specific to policy implementation to support policy evaluation efforts.

Indexed as

Tobacco ProductsTobacco, SmokelessAdultHumansIndiaPrevalenceTobacco ControlCOTPAImplementationImplementation researchIndiaNTCPTobacco control policiesTobacco use

Identifiers

PMID37821863
PMCPMC10568881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.