Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37821804›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2023

Stigmas of holoparasitic Phelipanche arenaria (Orobanchaceae) - a suitable ephemeric flower habitat for development unique microbiome.

Karolina Ruraż, Sebastian Wojciech Przemieniecki, Magdalena Błaszak, Sylwia Dagmara Czarnomska, Ireneusz Ochmian, Renata Piwowarczyk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karolina RurażCenter for Research and Conservation of Biodiversity, Department of Environmental Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Uniwersytecka 7, 25-406, Kielce, Poland. karolina.ruraz@ujk.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4831-7712
Sebastian Wojciech PrzemienieckiDepartment of Entomology, Phytopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Prawocheńskiego 17, 10-720, Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1222-0310
Magdalena BłaszakDepartment of Bioengineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434, Szczecin, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6798-4639
Sylwia Dagmara CzarnomskaMuseum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Nadwiślańska 108, 80-680, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8081-0956
Ireneusz OchmianDepartment of Horticulture, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434, Szczecin, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3606-1927
Renata PiwowarczykCenter for Research and Conservation of Biodiversity, Department of Environmental Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Uniwersytecka 7, 25-406, Kielce, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0507-7835
Jan Kochanowski University · PLWest Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin · PLMuseum and Institute of Zoology · PLUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

Jan Kochanowski University SUPB.RN.22.132National Science Centre, Poland 2021/05/X/NZ8/01154University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry 30.610.011-110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobial communities have occasionally been observed in part of the ephemeric reproductive structure of floral stigmas, but their prevalence, phylogenetic diversity and ecological roles are understudied. This report describes the first study of bacterial and fungal communities in immature and mature stigma tissue of the endangered holoparasitic plant Phelipanche arenaria. Culture-dependent methods coupled with next-generation sequencing indicated that a small surface of the flower stigma was an unexpectedly rich and diverse microhabitat for colonization of microbial. We also compared the enzymatic activity of the bacterial communities between immature and mature stigmas samples.

resultsUsing high-throughput sequencing methods, we identified and classified 39 to over 51 OTUs per sample for bacterial OTUs represented by Pantoea agglomerans and P. ananatis, comprising 50.6%, followed by Pseudomonas, Luteibacter spp., Sphingomonas spp. with 17% of total frequency. The bacterial profile of immature stigmas of P. arenaria contained unique microorganisms (21 of the most numerous OTUs) that were not confirmed in mature stigmas. However, the enzymatic activity of bacteria in mature stigmas of P. arenaria showed more activity than observed in immature stigmas. In the fungal profile, we recorded even 80 OTUs in mature stigmas, consisting of Capnodiales 45.03% of the total abundance with 28.27% of frequency was created by Alternaria eichhorniae (10.55%), Mycosphaerella tassiana (9.69%), and Aureobasidium pullulans (8.03%). Additionally, numerous putative plant growth-promoting bacteria, fungal pathogens and pathogen-antagonistic yeasts were also detected.

conclusionsOur study uncovered that P. arenaria stigmas host diverse bacterial and fungal communities. These microorganisms are well known and have been described as beneficial for biotechnological and environmental applications (e.g., production of different enzymes and antimicrobial compounds). This research provided valuable insight into the parasitic plant-microbe interactions.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaOrobanchaceaeBacteriaFlowersPhylogeny16S rRNA geneEnvironmentFlower microbiomeInternal transcribed spacer (ITS)Next-generation sequencingParasitic plants

Identifiers

PMID37821804
PMCPMC10566107
OpenAlexW4387531555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.