ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2023
Prediction models should contain predictors known at the moment of intended use.
Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of relapse in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease: external validation of the MOG-AR score.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Risk of bias in machine learning and statistical models to predict height or weight: a systematic review in fetal and paediatric medicine.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2025Review
- Musculoskeletal Health and Work: Development and Internal-External Cross-Validation of a Model to Predict Risk of Work Absence and Presenteeism in People Seeking Primary Healthcare.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Predicting Quality of Life in Parkinson's Disease: A Machine Learning Approach Employing Common Clinical Variables.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Reply to the letter "Prediction models should contain predictors known at the moment of intended use".Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
37821690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.