Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37821653›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2023

Gastric acid challenge of lithium disilicate-reinforced glass-ceramics and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic after polishing and glazing-impact on surface properties.

Jenni Hjerppe, Khalil Shahramian, Emil Rosqvist, Lippo V J Lassila, Jouko Peltonen, Timo O Närhi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of various aging treatments on the microhardness and surface roughness of CAD-CAM monolithic restorative materials.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jenni HjerppeClinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zürich, Plattenstrasse 11, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland. jenni.hjerppe@utu.fi.
Khalil ShahramianDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry and Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Turku, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, 20520, Turku, Finland.
Emil RosqvistPhysical Chemistry, Laboratory of Molecular Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, Henriksgatan 2, 20500, Turku, Finland.
Lippo V J LassilaLaboratory Manager, Turku Clinical Biomaterials Centre (TCBC), University of Turku, Itäinen Pitkäkatu 4B, 20520, Turku, Finland.
Jouko PeltonenPhysical Chemistry, Laboratory of Molecular Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, Henriksgatan 2, 20500, Turku, Finland.
Timo O NärhiDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry and Stomatognathic Physiology, University of Turku, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, 20520, Turku, Finland.
Åbo Akademi University · FIUniversity of Turku · FIUniversity of Zurich · CHVarsinais-Suomen Sairaanhoitopiiri · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the impact of simulated gastric acid on the surface properties of lithium disilicate-reinforced glass-ceramics and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic after certain polishing and glazing procedures. MATERIALS AND

methodsFour different types of square-shaped specimens (10 × 10 × 2 mm

resultsZR-LS specimens lost significantly more weight after acid immersion (p = 0.001), also surface microhardness of ZR-LS was significantly reduced (p = 0.001). LDS-G and LDS-PG showed significantly lower surface roughness (S

conclusionsGastric acid challenge affects the surface properties of lithium disilicate-reinforced glass-ceramic and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Glazing layer provides lower surface roughness, and the glazed surface tends to smoothen after the gastric acid challenge. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surface finish of lithium disilicate-reinforced glass-ceramic and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic has a clear impact on material's surface properties. Gastric acidic challenge changes surface properties but glazing seems to function as a protective barrier. Nevertheless, also glazing tends to smoothen after heavy gastric acid challenge. Glazing can be highly recommended to all glass-ceramic restorations but especially in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eating disorders like bulimia nervosa.

Indexed as

Gastric AcidLithiumCeramicsComputer-Aided DesignDental PorcelainHumansMaterials TestingSilicatesSurface PropertiesZirconiumDental Porcelainlithia disilicateLithiumSilicatesZirconiumzirconium oxideCorrosion resistanceGlass–ceramicSimulated gastric acidStomic force microscopySurface microhardnessSurface roughnessSurface topography

Identifiers

PMID37821653
PMCPMC10630222
OpenAlexW4387519743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.