Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37821506›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Technical aspects of a new approach to intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring during robotic rectal surgery.

Ramona Schuler, Christoph Marquardt, Georgi Kalev, Andreas Langer, Marko Konschake, Thomas Schiedeck, Julia Bandura, Matthias Goos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ramona SchulerResearch and Development, Dr. Langer Medical GmbH, Waldkirch, Germany.
Christoph MarquardtDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Pediatric Surgery, Ludwigsburg Hospital, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Georgi KalevDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Pediatric Surgery, Ludwigsburg Hospital, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Andreas LangerResearch and Development, Dr. Langer Medical GmbH, Waldkirch, Germany.
Marko KonschakeDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Institute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck (MUI), Innsbruck, Austria.
Thomas SchiedeckDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Pediatric Surgery, Ludwigsburg Hospital, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Julia BanduraResearch and Development, Dr. Langer Medical GmbH, Waldkirch, Germany.
Matthias GoosDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Helios Hospital Müllheim, Heliosweg 1, 79379, Müllheim, Germany. Matthias.Goos@helios-gesundheit.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been found that rectal surgery still leads to high rates of postoperative urinary, fecal, or sexual dysfunction, which is why nerve-sparing surgery has gained increasing importance. To improve functional outcomes, techniques to preserve pelvic autonomic nerves by identifying anatomic landmarks and implementing intraoperative neuromonitoring methods have been investigated. The objective of this study was to transfer a new approach to intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring based on bioimpedance measurement to a clinical setting. Thirty patients (16 male, 14 female) involved in a prospective clinical investigation (German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00017437, date of first registration 31/03/2020) underwent nerve-sparing rectal surgery using a new approach to intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring based on direct nerve stimulation and impedance measurement on target organs. Clinical feasibility of the method was outlined in 93.3% of the cases. Smooth muscle contraction of the urinary bladder and/ or the rectum in response to direct stimulation of innervating functional nerves correlated with a change in tissue impedance compared with the pre-contraction state. The mean amplitude (Amax) of positive signal responses was Amax = 3.8%, negative signal responses from a control tissue portion with no stimulation-induced impedance change had an amplitude variation of 0.4% on average. The amplitudes of positive and negative signal responses differed significantly (statistical analysis using two-sided t-test), allowing the nerves to be identified and preserved. The results indicate a reliable identification of pelvic autonomic nerves during rectal surgery.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMonitoring, IntraoperativePelvisProspective StudiesRectum

Identifiers

PMID37821506
PMCPMC10567681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.