ArticleScientific reports2023
Technical aspects of a new approach to intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring during robotic rectal surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urinary and sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery: A surgical challenge.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring based on bioimpedance signals: a new method analyzed on 30 patients.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
- Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation Level in Rectal Cancer Surgery beyond Conventions: A Review.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been found that rectal surgery still leads to high rates of postoperative urinary, fecal, or sexual dysfunction, which is why nerve-sparing surgery has gained increasing importance. To improve functional outcomes, techniques to preserve pelvic autonomic nerves by identifying anatomic landmarks and implementing intraoperative neuromonitoring methods have been investigated. The objective of this study was to transfer a new approach to intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring based on bioimpedance measurement to a clinical setting. Thirty patients (16 male, 14 female) involved in a prospective clinical investigation (German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00017437, date of first registration 31/03/2020) underwent nerve-sparing rectal surgery using a new approach to intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring based on direct nerve stimulation and impedance measurement on target organs. Clinical feasibility of the method was outlined in 93.3% of the cases. Smooth muscle contraction of the urinary bladder and/ or the rectum in response to direct stimulation of innervating functional nerves correlated with a change in tissue impedance compared with the pre-contraction state. The mean amplitude (Amax) of positive signal responses was Amax = 3.8%, negative signal responses from a control tissue portion with no stimulation-induced impedance change had an amplitude variation of 0.4% on average. The amplitudes of positive and negative signal responses differed significantly (statistical analysis using two-sided t-test), allowing the nerves to be identified and preserved. The results indicate a reliable identification of pelvic autonomic nerves during rectal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.