ArticleScientific reports2023
Large-scale genomic analyses with machine learning uncover predictive patterns associated with fungal phytopathogenic lifestyles and traits.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid CNN and multi-head attention model for analyzing epigenetic mechanisms and gene expression across fungal phylogenetic distances.iScience · 2026Article
- Whole genome sequencing and annotation of a non-pathogenic Fusarium brachygibbosum TZ1MST22 strain isolated from Medicago sativa in Southern Tunisian oases.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Genome evolution and transposable element expansion reveal host-associated genomic features in Cladosporium cucumerinum.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Decoding dark septate endophyte symbiosis: a functional and ecological perspective.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Genomic variant-driven prediction of azole resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
- A genomic perspective on fungal diversity and evolution.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025Review
- Hidden Allies: Decoding the Core Endohyphal Bacteriome of Aspergillus fumigatus.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Advancing fungal phylogenetics: integrating modern sequencing, dark taxa discovery, and machine learning.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Machine learning reveals genes impacting oxidative stress resistance across yeasts.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Starship giant transposable elements cluster by host taxonomy using k-mer-based phylogenetics.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Poplar: a phylogenomics pipeline.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- New approaches to tackle a rising problem: Large-scale methods to study antifungal resistance.PLoS pathogens · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive plant pathogenic fungi have a global impact, with devastating economic and environmental effects on crops and forests. Biosurveillance, a critical component of threat mitigation, requires risk prediction based on fungal lifestyles and traits. Recent studies have revealed distinct genomic patterns associated with specific groups of plant pathogenic fungi. We sought to establish whether these phytopathogenic genomic patterns hold across diverse taxonomic and ecological groups from the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, and furthermore, if those patterns can be used in a predictive capacity for biosurveillance. Using a supervised machine learning approach that integrates phylogenetic and genomic data, we analyzed 387 fungal genomes to test a proof-of-concept for the use of genomic signatures in predicting fungal phytopathogenic lifestyles and traits during biosurveillance activities. Our machine learning feature sets were derived from genome annotation data of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), peptidases, secondary metabolite clusters (SMCs), transporters, and transcription factors. We found that machine learning could successfully predict fungal lifestyles and traits across taxonomic groups, with the best predictive performance coming from feature sets comprising CAZyme, peptidase, and SMC data. While phylogeny was an important component in most predictions, the inclusion of genomic data improved prediction performance for every lifestyle and trait tested. Plant pathogenicity was one of the best-predicted traits, showing the promise of predictive genomics for biosurveillance applications. Furthermore, our machine learning approach revealed expansions in the number of genes from specific CAZyme and peptidase families in the genomes of plant pathogens compared to non-phytopathogenic genomes (saprotrophs, endo- and ectomycorrhizal fungi). Such genomic feature profiles give insight into the evolution of fungal phytopathogenicity and could be useful to predict the risks of unknown fungi in future biosurveillance activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.