Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37821489›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Birefringence-derived artifact in optical coherence tomography imaging of the lamina cribrosa in eyes with glaucoma.

Masahiro Miura, Shuichi Makita, Yoshiaki Yasuno, Hayate Nakagawa, Shinnosuke Azuma, Toshihiro Mino, Atsuya Miki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Masahiro MiuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ibaraki Medical Center, Tokyo Medical University, 3-20-1 Chuo, Ami, Inashiki, Ibaraki, 300395, Japan. m-miura@tokyo-med.ac.jp.
Shuichi MakitaComputational Optics Group, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yoshiaki YasunoComputational Optics Group, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Hayate NakagawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ibaraki Medical Center, Tokyo Medical University, 3-20-1 Chuo, Ami, Inashiki, Ibaraki, 300395, Japan.
Shinnosuke AzumaTopcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshihiro MinoTopcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsuya MikiDepartment of Myopia Control Research, Aichi Medical University, Nagakude, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated birefringence-derived artifacts that potentially mimic focal defects of the lamina cribrosa (focal LC defects) in optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of eyes with glaucoma. This study included 74 eyes of 48 patients with glaucoma. Five horizontal line B-scan images of the optic disc were obtained using commercial swept-source OCT. From a dataset of prototype swept-source polarization-diversity OCT, we calculated the following types of OCT images: polarization-dependent, polarization-dependent attenuation-coefficient, polarization-independent, and polarization-independent attenuation-coefficient. We assessed the commercial OCT images for the presence of birefringence-derived artifacts by comparison with the polarization-diversity OCT images. Commercial OCT showed suggestive findings of focal LC defects in 17 of 74 eyes. Reevaluation using polarization-independent OCT revealed that the focal LC defects in one of 17 eyes (5.9%) were actually birefringence-derived artifacts. This study demonstrated the existence of birefringence-derived artifacts mimicking focal LC defects in commercial OCT imaging and indicated that polarization-diversity OCT is an effective tool to evaluate the presence of these artifacts.

Indexed as

GlaucomaOptic Nerve DiseasesArtifactsBirefringenceHumansIntraocular PressureTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID37821489
PMCPMC10567729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.