Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37821480›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Miniaturization does not change conserved spider anatomy, a case study on spider Rayforstia (Araneae: Anapidae).

E A Propistsova, A A Makarova, K Y Eskov, A A Polilov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Organ-resolved lipid mapping inFrontiers in chemistry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E A PropistsovaFaculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia. propistsovae@yandex.ru.
A A MakarovaFaculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
K Y EskovBorissiak Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (PIN), Moscow, Russia.
A A PolilovFaculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RUInstitute of Paleontology A A Borisyak · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Miniaturization is an evolutionary trend observed in many animals. Some arachnid groups, such as spiders and mites, demonstrate a strong tendency toward miniaturization. Some of the most miniaturized spiders belong to the family Anapidae. In this study, using light and confocal microscopy and 3D modelling, we provide the first detailed description of the anatomy of a spider of the genus Rayforstia, which is only 900 µm long. In comparison with larger spiders, Rayforstia has no branching of the midgut in the prosoma and an increased relative brain volume. In contrast to many miniature insects and mites, the spider shows no reduction of whole organ systems, no allometry of the digestive and reproductive systems, and also no reduction of the set of muscles. Thus, miniature spider shows a more conserved anatomy than insects of a similar size. These findings expand our knowledge of miniaturization in terrestrial arthropods.

Indexed as

ArachnidaSpidersAnimalsBiological EvolutionInsectaMiniaturization

Identifiers

PMID37821480
PMCPMC10567922
OpenAlexW4387527820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.