ArticleCadernos de saude publica2023
[Judicialization of cannabidiol-based products in Brazil: an analysis from 2019 to 2022].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Therapeutic indications in lawsuits seeking medical Cannabis in Brazil: a cross-sectional study in light of scientific evidence].Cadernos de saude publica · 2026Article
- Expansion of the medical cannabis market in Brazil and regulatory challenges.Cadernos de saude publica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study analyzed the lawsuits of patients who requested cannabidiol (CBD)-based products from the Brazilian Unified National Health System during the period from 2019 to 2022, describing sociodemographic, clinical, and legal characteristics. This is a cross-sectional study composed of the evaluation of the technical notes issued by the Center for Technical Support of the Judiciary (NatJus), which supports judicial decisions. The data were obtained from the e-NatJus system, of the Brazilian Ministry of Justice, using web scraping techniques. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We analyzed 1,115 technical notes of the CBD plaintiffs, of which 54.7% of the male patients, with a mean age of 18.4 years, mostly from the South Region of the country (38.8%), and 49.6% sought treatment for epilepsy. Regarding the actions with favorable opinions, 28.8% had no scientific evidence, 26.5% pleaded for products without registration with the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency, and 25.3% of those that had registration were not in compliance with the therapeutic indication. Patients from the Northeast Region had a chance of a favorable opinion increased by 3.0 times and those diagnosed with epilepsy by 2.3. The expert opinions that supported the magistrates for the judicial decisions regarding the demands of patients for cannabidiol-based products in Brazil were mostly in accordance with scientific evidence, denoting the importance of NatJus in the qualification of access to medicinal products in the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.