Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37820187›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2023

Ethical dilemmas and illicit acts in nursing: reflections on the legal (dis)order.

Alex Coelho da Silva Duarte, Sandra Conceição Ribeiro Chicharo, Thiago Augusto Soares Monteiro da Silva, Alexandre Barbosa de Oliveira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alex Coelho da Silva DuarteUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1204-3943
Sandra Conceição Ribeiro ChicharoUniversidade Castelo Branco. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1487-0088
Thiago Augusto Soares Monteiro da SilvaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6870-5101
Alexandre Barbosa de OliveiraUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4611-1200
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Castelo Branco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto reflect on aspects of the legal system that involve situations of ethical dilemmas and illegal acts applied in legal proceedings related to nursing professionals.

methodstheoretical-reflective essay anchored in conceptions issued by a Brazilian nursing class body, based on technical opinions, in articulation with examples extracted from judges of the Superior Court of Justice.

resultsthe legal sources demonstrated the need to support nursing practices through a due and clear understanding of the notions addressed. Indeed, ethical dilemmas linked to professional practice usually refer to the psychological impact of having to act differently from what feels morally, ethically, or professionally appropriate. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: the reflection was guided by conceptual and legal issues involving nursing practice, pointing to the need to monitor the effects of legal disorder caused by current legislation, which may have implications for the legal security of professionals.

Indexed as

Ethics, NursingBrazilHumansNursing

Identifiers

PMID37820187
PMCPMC10561415
OpenAlexW4387414585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.