Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37820158›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2023

Validity study of the Three-Dimensional Work Fatigue Inventory among higher education nursing faculty.

Évilin Diniz Gutierres Ruivo, Laurelize Pereira Rocha, Jamila Geri Tomaschewski-Barlem, Graziele de Lima Dalmolin, Laís Farias Juliano, Janaína Cassana Mello Yasin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Évilin Diniz Gutierres RuivoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande. Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2263-6520
Laurelize Pereira RochaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande. Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9334-6550
Jamila Geri Tomaschewski-BarlemUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande. Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9125-9103
Graziele de Lima DalmolinUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria. Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0985-5788
Laís Farias JulianoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande. Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0593-0181
Janaína Cassana Mello YasinUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande. Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8001-8838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto adapt and validate the Three-Dimensional Work Fatigue Inventory (3D-WFI) for Brazil's cultural reality and assess the psychometric properties.

methodsa methodological study developed in six stages: initial translation; synthesis of translations; back translation; review by expert committee; pretest; and review of the adaptation process by the researchers. For validity, the instrument was applied to a sample of 318 nursing professors from Brazilian federal and state public universities. Data were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, composite reliability and instrument reliability (Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega).

resultsthe 3D-WFI instrument showed excellent internal consistency (α=0.95 and ω=0.97), three dimensions and explained variance of 62.77%.

conclusionsthe Brazilian version of the instrument showed excellent psychometric properties for assessing fatigue among Brazilian workers.

Indexed as

Faculty, NursingTranslationsBrazilFatigueHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37820158
PMCPMC10561935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.