Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37819804›Full record

SynthesisBJS open2023

Undergraduate teaching of surgical skills in the UK: systematic review.

Sean C Glossop, Hari Bhachoo, Thomas M Murray, Rayan A Cherif, John Y Helo, Evie Morgan, Arwel T Poacher

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. What Do Undergraduate Medical Students Value in Plastic Surgery Conferences?Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sean C GlossopSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8495-0860
Hari BhachooSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7902-8182
Thomas M MurraySchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, UK.
Rayan A CherifSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, UK.
John Y HeloSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, UK.
Evie MorganSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK.
Arwel T PoacherDepartment of Plastic Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, Guys and St Thomas' Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4200-4929
Cardiff University · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudents must be proficient in surgical skills according to General Medical Council and Royal College of Surgeons of England guidelines. If these skills are not appropriately taught, there is a risk of an incoming junior workforce with inadequate surgical skills. This paper aimed to review the literature relating to undergraduate teaching of surgical skills in the UK and summarize future suggested training methods.

methodsThe databases MEDLINE, Embase and SCOPUS were searched, and the existing literature relating to methodology of undergraduate teaching of surgical skills in the UK over the past 10 years was summarized. The Medical Education Research Quality Instrument was used to assess research quality.

resultsA total of 19 papers were included. Cross-sectional evaluations and survey-based studies highlight a clear deficit in surgical skills teaching in the UK. Medical students are currently unable to fulfil their own learning needs and meet requirements set out by the General Medical Council. This lack of surgical teaching appears to negatively affect student desire to pursue a surgical career. The three main themes for improvement are extracurricular surgical skills days, near-peer teaching and simulation. Each method appeared to improve learning, although no studies utilized medium- to long-term follow-up to demonstrate efficacy and there lacks a clear consensus as to the 'standard' of undergraduate surgical skill education. There was also potential for selection bias and response shift bias in many of the studies assessing pre- and postintervention confidence and opinions.

conclusionThere is a concerning lack of surgical skills teaching that has resulted in medical students and junior doctors not having the necessary surgical skills as per General Medical Council guidance and students feel that their own learning needs are not met. This failure to address the learning deficit may be responsible for the fall in surgical competition ratios. While surgical skills teaching must be improved urgently, more robust evidence is required to evaluate the optimal ways of approaching this issue.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumEnglandHumansStudents

Identifiers

PMID37819804
PMCPMC10566575
OpenAlexW4387542969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.