Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37819599›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee classification does not change as knee osteoarthritis progresses: a longitudinal study from the Toei study.

Kazuki Nomoto, Mitsuru Hanada, Kensuke Hotta, Yukihiro Matsuyama

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. [Biomechanical study of knee joint based on coronal plane alignment of the knee].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kazuki NomotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Higashi-Ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan. nomonomo1988@gmail.com.
Mitsuru HanadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Higashi-Ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan.
Kensuke HottaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Higashi-Ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan.
Yukihiro MatsuyamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1, Handayama, Higashi-Ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431-3192, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes of individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression. We hypothesized that distributions of CPAK phenotypes would be similar throughout OA progression, despite arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO) changing.

methodsA total of 248 patients (79 men and 169 women) participated in the first study in 2012 and the fifth study in 2020. Patients with progression of knee OA for eight years were included. Knee OA progression was defined as advancement from KL grade 0-2 to KL grade 3 or 4. Alignment parameters, including the aHKA, JLO, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femur angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA), were measured. Changes in distribution of CPAK classifications and alignment parameters were investigated. Alignment parameters were compared using a paired t-test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

resultsThe study included 48 patients (60 knees). The distributions of all CPAK phenotypes were similar between 2012 and 2020. MPTA (83.7° ± 2.8° vs. 82.3° ± 4.8°, p < 0.01), aHKA (- 3.6° ± 3.8° vs. - 4.9° ± 6.2°, p = 0.01), and JLO (171.1° ± 4.6° vs. 169.5° ± 5.1°, p < 0.01) decreased significantly, and JLCA (1.17° ± 2.2° vs. 3.1° ± 4.7°, p < 0.01) and HKA (4.8° ± 3.9° vs. 8.0° ± 5.4°, p < 0.01) increased significantly. In contrast, LDFA (87.4° ± 3.2° vs. 87.2° ± 3.1°, p = n.s.) did not change significantly.

conclusionsThe CPAK classification system can predict constitutional alignment, even with knee OA progression, and enables surgeons to perform individualized preoperative alignment planning according to knee phenotypes.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeFemaleHumansKnee JointLongitudinal StudiesMaleRetrospective StudiesTibiaCoronal plane alignment of the kneeKnee alignmentLongitudinal studyOsteoarthritisPhenotype

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.