Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37819578›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2023

Comparative studies of the sensitivities of sparse and full geometries of Total-Body PET scanners built from crystals and plastic scintillators.

M Dadgar, S Parzych, J Baran, N Chug, C Curceanu, E Czerwiński, K Dulski, K Elyan, A Gajos, B C Hiesmayr and 21 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06211803 completednot on this map

Clinical Application of the Prototype J-PET Device

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorJagiellonian UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsNeurodegenerative Diseases, Brain Neoplasms, Neuroendocrine TumorsArmsPositron-Emission Tomography Imaging
NCT06242119 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Use of a J-PET Scanner Prototype Made of Plastic Scintilators

TypeobservationalSponsorJagiellonian UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled25ConditionsProstate Cancer, Prostatic Hyperplasia, Prostatic Neoplasms, Prostate Cancer MetastaticArmsJ-PET scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Large axial field of view PET/CT - Not just a longer PET gantry.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Total Body PET.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

M DadgarDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland. meysam.dadgar@uj.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7160-5715
S ParzychDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
J BaranDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
N ChugDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
C CurceanuINFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy.
E CzerwińskiDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
K DulskiDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
K ElyanDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
A GajosDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
B C HiesmayrFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ł KapłonDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
K KlimaszewskiDepartment of Complex Systems, National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
P KonieczkaDepartment of Complex Systems, National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
G KorcylDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
T KozikDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
W KrzemienHigh Energy Physics Division, National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
D KumarDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
S NiedzwieckiDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
D PanekDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
E Perez Del RioDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
L RaczyńskiDepartment of Complex Systems, National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
S SharmaDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
S ShivaniDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
R Y ShopaDepartment of Complex Systems, National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
M SkurzokDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
E Ł StepieńDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
F Tayefi ArdebiliDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
K Tayefi ArdebiliDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
S VandenbergheDepartment of Electronics and Information Systems, MEDISIP, MEDISIP, Ghent University-IBiTech, Ghent, Belgium.
W WiślickiDepartment of Complex Systems, National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
P MoskalDepartment of Experimental Particle Physics and Applications, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy, and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland. p.moskal@uj.edu.pl.

Funding

Foundation for Polish Science TEAM POIR.04.04.00 - 00 - 4204/17Ministry of Education and Science SPUB/SP/530054/2022Narodowym Centrum Nauki 2021/42/A/ST2/00423PRELUDIUM 19 UMO - 2020/37/N/NZ7/04106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlongside the benefits of Total-Body imaging modalities, such as higher sensitivity, single-bed position, low dose imaging, etc., their final construction cost prevents worldwide utilization. The main aim of this study is to present a simulation-based comparison of the sensitivities of existing and currently developed tomographs to introduce a cost-efficient solution for constructing a Total-Body PET scanner based on plastic scintillators.

methodsFor the case of this study, eight tomographs based on the uEXPLORER configuration with different scintillator materials (BGO, LYSO), axial field-of-view (97.4 cm and 194.8 cm), and detector configurations (full and sparse) were simulated. In addition, 8 J-PET scanners with different configurations, such as various axial field-of-view (200 cm and 250 cm), different cross sections of plastic scintillator, and multiple numbers of plastic scintillator layers (2, 3, and 4), based on J-PET technology have been simulated by GATE software. Furthermore, Siemens' Biograph Vision has been simulated to compare the results with standard PET scans. Two types of simulations have been performed. The first one with a centrally located source with a diameter of 1 mm and a length of 250 cm, and the second one with the same source inside a water-filled cylindrical phantom with a diameter of 20 cm and a length of 183 cm.

resultsWith regards to sensitivity, among all the proposed scanners, the ones constructed with BGO crystals give the best performance ([Formula: see text] 350 cps/kBq at the center). The utilization of sparse geometry or LYSO crystals significantly lowers the achievable sensitivity of such systems. The J-PET design gives a similar sensitivity to the sparse LYSO crystal-based detectors while having full detector coverage over the body. Moreover, it provides uniform sensitivity over the body with additional gain on its sides and provides the possibility for high-quality brain imaging.

conclusionTaking into account not only the sensitivity but also the price of Total-Body PET tomographs, which till now was one of the main obstacles in their widespread clinical availability, the J-PET tomography system based on plastic scintillators could be a cost-efficient alternative for Total-Body PET scanners.

Indexed as

GATE simulationJ-PETSensitivityTotal-Body PETuEXPLORER

Identifiers

PMID37819578
PMCPMC10567620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.