Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37819572›Full record

ArticleAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry2024

Optical manipulation and fusion of aqueous droplets containing inorganic and organic solutes in air using the dual-beam laser trapping technique.

Yuta Tanaka, Shoji Ishizaka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuta TanakaGraduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8526, Japan.
Shoji IshizakaGraduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8526, Japan. ishizaka@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9866-5809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comparative evaluation of two aerosol droplets of different chemical compositions using the dual-beam laser trapping technique can be employed for highly sensitive and accurate measurements of the water activities of such droplets. However, it is technically difficult to load droplets of different chemical compositions into adjacent optical traps that are only a few tens of micrometers apart. To overcome this challenge, a chamber with an overhanging roof was created. This roof prevented the initially trapped droplets from being contaminated by aerosol droplets that were subsequently introduced into the chamber. Herein, we report the simultaneous laser trapping of an aqueous ammonium sulfate (AS) droplet and an aqueous succinic acid (SA) droplet in air using the dual-beam laser trapping technique. Two droplets were successfully fused through optical manipulation to form a mixed inorganic/organic droplet in air. This experimental approach is advantageous because it forms mixed inorganic/organic droplets under constant relative humidity (RH) conditions. However, in previous studies, it was necessary to compensate for changes in RH prior to and after droplet fusion. To assess the validity of theoretical predictions of the water activity of droplets containing AS and SA, the equilibrium radii of the droplet were compared with those calculated using certain theoretical models.

Indexed as

AerosolAmmonium sulfateOptical tweezersRaman spectroscopySuccinic acid

Identifiers

PMID37819572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.