ArticleGenes, chromosomes & cancer2024
When molecular outsmarts morphology: Malignant ossifying fibromyxoid tumors masquerading as osteosarcomas, including a novel CREBZF::PHF1 fusion.
Article in Genes, chromosomes & cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive review of ossifying fibromyxoid tumor: insights into its clinical, pathological, and molecular landscape.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Ossification-deficient atypical ossifying fibromyxoid tumor of submandibular gland with PHF1::EP400 fusion: diagnostic challenges.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Article
- A potential conundrum in dermatopathology: molecularly confirmed superficial ossifying fibromyxoid tumors with unusual histomorphologic findings and a novel fusion.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present two cases of malignant ossifying fibromyxoid tumor (OFMT) which eluded diagnosis due to compelling clinicopathologic mimicry, compounded by similarly elusive underlying molecular drivers. The first is of a clavicle mass in a 69 year-old female, which histologically showed an infiltrative nested and trabeculated proliferation of monomorphic cells giving rise to scattered spicules of immature woven bone. Excepting SATB2 positivity, the lesion showed an inconclusive immunoprofile which along with negative PHF1 FISH led to an initial diagnosis of high-grade osteosarcoma. Next generation sequencing (NGS) revealed a particularly rare CREBBP::BCORL1 fusion. The second illustrates the peculiar presentation of a dural-based mass in a 52 year-old female who presented with neurologic dyscrasias. Sections showed a sheeted monotonous proliferation of ovoid to spindle cells, but in contrast to Case #1, the tumor contained an exuberance of reticular osteoid and woven bone deposition mimicking malignant osteogenic differentiation. NGS showed a novel CREBZF::PHF1 fusion. Both tumors recurred locally less than 1 year post-operatively. As such we reiterate that careful morphologic examination is axiomatic to any diagnosis in our discipline, but this paradigm must shift to recognize that molecular diagnostics can provide closure where traditional tools have notable limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.