ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024
Total-body PET/CT with half-dose [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ExpandingEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance and image quality of total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging using a half-dose of [
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 52 patients with biochemical recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy who underwent total-body PET/CT with a half-dose (0.9-1.1 MBq/kg) of [
resultsNo significant difference in subjective image quality was found between the G2 and full-dose groups (p > 0.05). PET/CT image quality was significantly higher for the G5 versus G2 (p < 0.001) and full-dose groups (p < 0.001). TBR did not differ between the G2 and full-dose groups (4.23 ± 5.21 vs 4.22 ± 3.97, p = 0.99). Liver BV was significantly lower for G2 versus full-dose groups (0.16 ± 0.03 vs 0.20 ± 0.05, p < 0.001).
conclusionsTotal-body PET/CT with a half-dose [
Indexed as
Identifiers
37819451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.