Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37819438›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

Prediction of postoperative liver metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on multiparametric magnetic resonance radiomics combined with serological markers: a cohort study of machine learning.

Zhongyu Yuan, Zhenyu Shu, Jiaxuan Peng, Wei Wang, Jie Hou, Lu Han, Guangying Zheng, Yuguo Wei, Jianguo Zhong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhongyu YuanJinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, China.
Zhenyu ShuCancer Center, Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hanzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiaxuan PengJinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, China.
Wei WangJinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, China.
Jie HouJinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, China.
Lu HanJinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, China.
Guangying ZhengJinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, China.
Yuguo WeiAdvanced Analytics, Global Medical Service, GE Healthcare, China, Xihu District, Hangzhou, 310000, China.
Jianguo ZhongCancer Center, Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hanzhou, Zhejiang, China. zhongjianguo@hmc.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1576-5121
Jinzhou Medical University · CNHangzhou Medical College · CN

Funding

Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province 2021KY465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo construct and validate a multi-dimensional model based on multiple machine leaning algorithms to predict PCLM using multi-parameter magnetic resonance (MRI) sequences with clinical and imaging parameters.

methodsA total of 148 PDAC retrospectively examined patients were classified as metastatic or non-metastatic based on results at 3 months after surgery. The radiomics features of the primary tumor were extracted from T2WI images, followed by dimension reduction. Then, multiple machine learning methods were used to construct models. Independent predictors were also screened using multifactor logistic regression and a nomogram was constructed in combination with the radiomics model. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the accuracy and reliability of the nomogram.

resultsThe diagnostic efficacy of the radiomics model in the training and test set was 0.822 and 0.803, sensitivity was 0.742 and 0.692, and specificity was 0.792 and 0.875, respectively. The diagnostic efficacy of the nomogram in the training and test set was 0.866 and 0.832.

conclusionA radiomics nomogram based on machine learning improved the accuracy of predicting PCLM and may be useful for early preoperative diagnosis.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalLiver NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsCohort StudiesHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyRadiomicsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesCA125CA19-9Machine learningMagnetic resonance imagingPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID37819438
OpenAlexW4387535124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.