ArticlePediatric radiology2023
Percutaneous treatment of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis in adolescents using large-bore thrombectomy systems.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Venous Intervention in Children: Current Practice and Controversies.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Review
- Endovascular Management of Pediatric Deep Venous Thrombosis.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2025Review
- Successful ilio-femoral-popliteal venous aspiration thrombectomy using a 12 French system in a pediatric patient.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Endovascular interventions in cancer patients with compromise of the mediastinal vasculature: a review.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile large-bore mechanical thrombectomy provides effective venous thrombus removal, often with avoidance of thrombolytics, literature surrounding the application of these devices in pediatric patients is sparse.
objectiveTo report technical success and outcomes following large-bore thrombectomy systems in adolescent patients with deep venous thrombosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective review identified all patients less than 18 years of age undergoing mechanical venous thrombectomy at a single institution between 2018 and 2022. No patients were excluded. Technical success was defined as extraction of thrombus sufficient to restore unimpeded flow in affected segments. Clinical success was defined as resolution of presenting symptoms.
resultsNine consecutive patients (6 females, 3 males; age range 15-17 years) underwent 10 thrombectomy procedures using ClotTriever (n=6; 60%), FlowTriever (n=2; 20%), or both (n=2; 20%). Chronicity of thrombus was categorized as acute (<2 weeks) in 6 (60%), subacute (2-6 weeks) in 1 (10%), and chronic (>6 weeks) in 3 (30%). Distribution of thrombus was lower extremity and/or inferior vena cava (IVC) in 9 (90%) and unilateral axillo-subclavian in 1 (10%). Technical success was achieved in 9 interventions (90%). Clinical success was achieved in 8 patients (88.9%). No patients received thrombolytics. There were no intraprocedural adverse events (AE). Minor complications (Society of Interventional Radiology mild adverse events) were observed in a delayed fashion following 2 interventions (20%).
conclusionsThis preliminary experience demonstrated high rates of technical and clinical success with large-bore deep venous thrombectomy in adolescent patients across a range of thrombus chronicity and locations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.