Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37819397›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Calcific tendinitis].

Andreas Sperr, Bernd Erber, Annie Horng, Christian Glaser

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas SperrKlinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Bernd ErberKlinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, LMU Klinikum, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. bernd.erber@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Annie HorngRZM - Radiologisches Zentrum München, München, Deutschland.
Christian GlaserRZM - Radiologisches Zentrum München, München, Deutschland.
LMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueCalcific tendinitis (TC) is a common-usually self-limiting-musculoskeletal disease, histopathologically characterized by both deposition and subsequent inflammatory breakdown of calcium crystals in tendons. The disease can cause acute, sometimes excruciating pain and restricted movement in the shoulder joint. Furthermore, 10-30% of patients have a complicated course of the disease. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsImaging-based assessment by X‑ray and ultrasound is required to establish the initial diagnosis and differential diagnosis as well as for follow-up. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and, to a lesser degree, computed tomography (CT) complete the imaging work-up for establishing differential diagnoses and detecting complications. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The combined evaluation of clinical symptoms and imaging findings is crucial to assess prognosis, plan therapy and detect potential complications. This article provides an overview of imaging-based morphology as related to the different stages of TC, relevant complications and potential pitfalls with respect to comorbidities and differential diagnoses.

Indexed as

Shoulder JointTendinopathyHumansPainRadiographyTendonsCalcific shoulderCalcium depositsDiagnosisRotator cuffTendons

Identifiers

PMID37819397
OpenAlexW4387540409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.