ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Deep learning to assist composition classification and thyroid solid nodule diagnosis: a multicenter diagnostic study.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of ultrasound characteristics-based artificial intelligence models for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-based multimodal multitask analysis of thyroid ultrasound image features predicts thyroid cancer: a multicenter study.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules based on thyroid ultrasound: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with external datasets.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Deep learning prediction model based on multi-modal transvaginal ultrasound scan images for endometrial cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of thyroid diseases: applications and challenges.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Review
- Integrating Robotic Bilateral Axillo-Breast Approach Thyroidectomy with Molecular Diagnostics and Artificial Intelligence in Thyroid Cancer Care.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2026Review
- A "calcification"-enhanced deep learning approach for precise differentiation of thyroid nodules.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Article
- A multicenter diagnostic study of thyroid nodule with Hashimoto's thyroiditis enabled by Hashimoto's thyroiditis nodule-artificial intelligence model.European radiology · 2025Article
- A narrative review on innovations of thyroid nodule ultrasound diagnosis: applications of robot and artificial intelligence technology.Gland surgery · 2025Review
- Multimodal GPT model for assisting thyroid nodule diagnosis and management.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- A deep learning based ultrasound diagnostic tool driven by 3D visualization of thyroid nodules.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Research progress on artificial intelligence technology-assisted diagnosis of thyroid diseases.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Deep learning model for diagnosis of thyroid nodules with size less than 1 cm: A multicenter, retrospective study.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
- Video-based AI module with raw-scale and ROI-scale information for thyroid nodule diagnosis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- The clinical value of artificial intelligence in assisting junior radiologists in thyroid ultrasound: a multicenter prospective study from real clinical practice.BMC medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to propose a deep learning (DL)-based framework for identifying the composition of thyroid nodules and assessing their malignancy risk.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter study using ultrasound images from four hospitals. Convolutional neural network (CNN) models were constructed to classify ultrasound images of thyroid nodules into solid and non-solid, as well as benign and malignant. A total of 11,201 images of 6784 nodules were used for training, validation, and testing. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was employed as the primary evaluation index.
resultsThe models had AUCs higher than 0.91 in the benign and malignant grading of solid thyroid nodules, with the Inception-ResNet AUC being the highest at 0.94. In the test set, the best algorithm for identifying benign and malignant thyroid nodules had a sensitivity of 0.88, and a specificity of 0.86. In the human vs. DL test set, the best algorithm had a sensitivity of 0.93, and a specificity of 0.86. The Inception-ResNet model performed better than the senior physicians (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the optimal model based on the external test set were 0.90 and 0.75, respectively.
conclusionsThis research demonstrates that CNNs can assist thyroid nodule diagnosis and reduce the rate of unnecessary fine-needle aspiration (FNA). CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: High-resolution ultrasound has led to increased detection of thyroid nodules. This results in unnecessary fine-needle aspiration and anxiety for patients whose nodules are benign. Deep learning can solve these problems to some extent. KEY POINTS: • Thyroid solid nodules have a high probability of malignancy. • Our models can improve the differentiation between benign and malignant solid thyroid nodules. • The differential performance of one model was superior to that of senior radiologists. Applying this could reduce the rate of unnecessary fine-needle aspiration of solid thyroid nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37819276What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.