Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37818710›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2023

Latent profiles identified from psychological test data for people convicted of sexual offences in the UK.

Steven M Gillespie, Ian A Elliott

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Offending Trajectories of Men With Adult-Onset Sexual Offending Histories.Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven M GillespieDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7789-5381
Ian A ElliottHis Majesty's Prison and Probation Service, Ministry of Justice, London, UK; and Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/T002824/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne size does not fit all in assessment and intervention for people with convictions for sexual offences. Crime scene indicators and risk-related variables have been used to identify distinct clusters of people with convictions for sexual offences, but there is a need for more robust typologies that identify clusters based on psychologically meaningful risk factors that can be targeted in treatment.

aimsTo use robust modelling techniques to identify latent profiles of people with convictions for sexual offences based on indicators of dynamic risk.

methodAdult male participants, who had been convicted for sexual offences and assessed for eligibility for the prison-based Core Sex Offender Treatment Programme delivered by His Majesty's Prison and Probation Service (UK), were randomly allocated to a test (

resultsFive latent profiles were identified in the test and validation data-sets. These were labelled low psychological impairment, impulsive, distorted thinker, rape preoccupied and child fantasist. Profiles varied in individual characteristics, offence histories, victim preferences and level of risk.

conclusionsOur findings should be used to guide assessment and intervention practices that are tailored to distinct psychological profiles consistent with principles of risk, need and responsivity.

Indexed as

RapeSex OffensesAdultChildCrimeHumansMalePsychological TestsUnited KingdomMental health servicespsychiatry and lawpsychological testingrisk assessmentsexual offending.

Identifiers

PMID37818710
PMCPMC10727912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.