Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37818501›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Accuracy of Ultrasound and Computed Tomography in Diagnosing Acute Cholecystitis Patients in a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia.

Mawya A Khafaji, Juman T Bagasi, Sarah K Albahiti, Lama A Alsayegh, Shahd A Alsayyad, Seba S Algarni, Sarah Y Bahowarth, Ebtihal S Baghdadi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mawya A KhafajiRadiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Juman T BagasiFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Sarah K AlbahitiRadiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Lama A AlsayeghFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Shahd A AlsayyadFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Seba S AlgarniFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Sarah Y BahowarthFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Ebtihal S BaghdadiFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
King Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a gallbladder inflammatory disease often associated with gallbladder stones. It accounts for up to 5% of emergency department visits. The majority of patients present with pain in the right upper quadrant, Murphy's sign, and fever. Furthermore, Saudi Arabia has been noted to have a significant prevalence of AC. According to the 2018 Tokyo Guidelines, imaging is an essential element, combined with local and systemic evidence of inflammation, for a confirmed diagnosis of AC. The definitive therapy is conducted surgically by cholecystectomy either urgently or electively. However, there are insufficient studies that focus on the accuracy of imaging in diagnosing AC patients in Saudi Arabia. Objective The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of ultrasound (US) versus computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing AC patients at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods and material A retrospective record review was conducted at KAUH during the period of June to July 2022. The study included 192 patients diagnosed with AC in the emergency department or outpatient department by US or CT or both and confirmed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and histopathology between 2016 and 2022. Results The most common modality used was US (79.7%), followed by both US and contrast CT (10.9%). For CT, sensitivity was 81.3%, specificity was 62.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 59.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 83.3%. For US, sensitivity was 37.9%, specificity was 81.7%, PPV was 50%, and NPV was 73.1%. A significant relationship was observed between both genders and high use of US (P = 0.0001). Conclusion We found that CT is more sensitive than US, while US is more specific in diagnosing AC.

Indexed as

accuracyacute cholecystitiscomputed tomographyctnegative predictive value (npv)positive predictive value (ppv)sensitivityspecificityultrasoundus

Identifiers

PMID37818501
PMCPMC10560961
OpenAlexW4386579501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.