ArticleSurgery open science2023
Children are small adults (when properly normalized): Transferrable/generalizable sepsis prediction.
Article in Surgery open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning on the Pediatric Intensive Care (PIC) Database: PIC-Powered Prediction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in Pediatric Healthcare: Current Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A scoping review on pediatric sepsis prediction technologies in healthcare.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Though governed by the same underlying biology, the differential physiology of children causes the temporal evolution from health to a septic/diseased state to follow trajectories that are distinct from adult cases. As pediatric sepsis data sets are less readily available than for adult sepsis, we aim to leverage this shared underlying biology by normalizing pediatric physiological data such that it would be directly comparable to adult data, and then develop machine-learning (ML) based classifiers to predict the onset of sepsis in the pediatric population. We then externally validated the classifiers in an independent adult dataset. Methods: Vital signs and laboratory observables were obtained from the Pediatric Intensive Care (PIC) database. These data elements were normalized for age and placed on a continuous scale, termed the Continuous Age-Normalized SOFA (CAN-SOFA) score. The XGBoost algorithm was used to classify pediatric patients that are septic. We tested the trained model using adult data from the MIMIC-IV database. Results: On the pediatric population, the sepsis classifier has an accuracy of 0.84 and an F1-Score of 0.867. On the adult population, the sepsis classifier has an accuracy of 0.80 and an F1-score of 0.88; when tested on the adult population, the model showed similar performance degradation ("data drift") as in the pediatric population. Conclusions: In this work, we demonstrate that, using a straightforward age-normalization method, EHR's can be generalizable compared (at least in the context of sepsis) between the pediatric and adult populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.