ArticleEndoscopy international open2023
Predictors of success of conventional ERCP for bile duct stones and need for single-operator cholangioscopy.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive factors for the necessity of peroral cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy in the endoscopic treatment of cystic duct confluence stones: a retrospective study in Japan.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of bile duct stones.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- The Predictive Value of the Combination of Serum RBP4, ALP, IL-1β for Postoperative Recurrence of Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
- Comparative Study of Endoscopic Treatment for Intrahepatic and Common Bile Duct Stones Using Peroral Cholangioscopy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Predictors of a need for cholangioscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy in the management of difficult common bile duct stones.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.