Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37818333›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Neural drive and motor unit characteristics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: implications for quadriceps weakness.

David A Sherman, Justin Rush, Matt S Stock, Christopher D Ingersoll, Grant E Norte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Emerging role of brain-computer interface in orthopedic rehabilitation and motor function restoration].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David A ShermanLive4 Physical Therapy and Wellness, Acton, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3027-9124
Justin RushDivision of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation and Communication Sciences, College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America.
Matt S StockCognition, Neuroplasticity, & Sarcopenia (CNS) Lab, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1156-1084
Christopher D IngersollCollege of Health Professions and Sciences, School of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States of America.
Grant E NorteCognition, Neuroplasticity, & Sarcopenia (CNS) Lab, Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States of America.
University of Central Florida · USBoston University · USOhio University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the quality of neural drive and recruited quadriceps motor units' (MU) action potential amplitude (MUAP Methods: Fourteen individuals with ACLR and 13 matched controls performed trapezoidal knee extensor contractions at 30%, 50%, 70%, and 100% of their maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Decomposition electromyography (dEMG) and torque were recorded concurrently. The Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) and central activation ratio (CAR) were acquired bilaterally to detail the proportion of MU pool available and volitionally activated. We examined MUAP Results: Individuals with ACLR demonstrated lower MVIC torque in the involved limb compared to uninvolved limb. There were no differences in H-reflex or CAR between groups or limbs. The ACLR involved limb demonstrated smaller mass-normalized RT range and slower MU firing rates at high contraction intensities (70% and 100% MVIC) compared to uninvolved and control limbs. The ACLR involved limb also demonstrated larger MU action potentials in the VM compared to the contralateral limb. These differences were largely attenuated with relative RT normalization. Conclusions: These results suggest that persistent strength deficits following ACLR may be attributable to a diminished quadriceps motor neuron pool and inability to upregulate the firing rate of recruited MUs.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionMuscle WeaknessQuadriceps MuscleRecruitment, NeurophysiologicalHumansKneeKnee JointAnterior cruciate ligamentMotor neuron poolMotor unitQuadriceps weaknessrehabilitationVoluntary activation

Identifiers

PMID37818333
PMCPMC10561646
OpenAlexW4387403701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.