ArticleRSC advances2023
Development of two highly sensitive and selective sensor-assisted fluorescence immunoassays for trace determination of copper residues in food samples.
Article in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study describes the development of two highly sensitive and selective sensor-assisted fluorescence immunoassays for the trace determination of copper ions, Cu(ii) residues, in food samples. These assays were the microwell-based fluoroimmuoassay (FIA) and the kinetic exclusion assay (KinExA). FIA and KinExA were assisted by a microplate reader and a KinExA™ 3200 immunosensor, respectively. Both FIA and KinExA were developed utilizing the same antibody, capturing reagent, and fluorescence signal-generating reagent. The antibody was a mouse monoclonal antibody, designated as 8D66, that specifically recognized the Cu(ii)-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid complex (Cu(ii)-EDTA) but did not recognize Cu(ii)-free EDTA. The capturing reagent was Cu(ii)-EDTA covalently linked to bovine serum albumin protein (Cu(ii)-EDTA-BSA). The fluorescence-generating reagent was an anti-mouse IgG conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (IgG-FITC). Both FIA and KinExA involved competitive binding reactions between Cu(ii)-EDTA complexes, formed in the sample solution, and Cu(ii)-EDTA-BSA conjugate which has been immobilized onto microwell fluorescence assay plates (in FIA) or polymethylmethacrylate beads (in KinExA) for a limited quantity of binding sites of 8D66 antibody. The conditions of both FIA and KinExA were investigated, and the optimum procedures were established. Both FIA and KinExA were validated, and all validation parameters were acceptable. Many different metal ions that are commonly encountered in food samples did not interfere with Cu(ii) analysis by both FIA and KinExA. Both assays were applied to the determination of Cu(ii) in food samples with satisfactory accuracy and precision. Both assays were compared favorably with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. Comparative evaluation of FIA and KinExA revealed that KinExA had higher sensitivity and better precision than FIA, whereas, both assays had comparable accuracy. Both FIA and KinExA were superior to the existing atomic spectrometric methods for Cu(ii). The proposed FIA and KinExA are anticipated to effectively contribute to assessing Cu(ii) concentrations and controlling the exposure of humans to its potential toxicities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.