Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37818248›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

The role of seasonality in shaping the interactions of honeybees with other taxa.

Helena Wirta, Mirkka Jones, Pablo Peña-Aguilera, Camilo Chacón-Duque, Eero Vesterinen, Otso Ovaskainen, Nerea Abrego, Tomas Roslin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Helena WirtaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4667-2166
Mirkka JonesOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8157-8730
Pablo Peña-AguileraDepartment of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8999-1140
Camilo Chacón-DuqueCentre for Palaeogenetics Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0715-1947
Eero VesterinenDepartment of Biology University of Turku Turku Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3665-5802
Otso OvaskainenOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9750-4421
Nerea AbregoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6347-6127
Tomas RoslinDepartment of Agricultural Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2957-4791
University of Helsinki · FIStockholm University · SESwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Eltonian niche of a species is defined as its set of interactions with other taxa. How this set varies with biotic, abiotic and human influences is a core question of modern ecology. In seasonal environments, the realized Eltonian niche is likely to vary due to periodic changes in the occurrence and abundance of interaction partners and changes in species behavior and preferences. Also, human management decisions may leave strong imprints on species interactions. To compare the impact of seasonality to that of management effects, honeybees provide an excellent model system. Based on DNA traces of interaction partners archived in honey, we can infer honeybee interactions with floral resources and microbes in the surrounding habitats, their hives, and themselves. Here, we resolved seasonal and management-based impacts on honeybee interactions by sampling beehives repeatedly during the honey-storing period of honeybees in Finland. We then use a genome-skimming approach to identify the taxonomic contents of the DNA in the samples. To compare the effects of the season to the effects of location, management, and the colony itself in shaping honeybee interactions, we used joint species distribution modeling. We found that honeybee interactions with other taxa varied greatly among taxonomic and functional groups. Against a backdrop of wide variation in the interactions documented in the DNA content of honey from bees from different hives, regions, and beekeepers, the imprint of the season remained relatively small. Overall, a honey-based approach offers unique insights into seasonal variation in the identity and abundance of interaction partners among honeybees. During the summer, the availability and use of different interaction partners changed substantially, but hive- and taxon-specific patterns were largely idiosyncratic as modified by hive management. Thus, the beekeeper and colony identity are as important determinants of the honeybee's realized Eltonian niche as is seasonality.

Indexed as

Apis melliferaEltonian nichehoneyjoint species distribution modelingmanagementmicrobeplantwhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37818248
PMCPMC10560870
OpenAlexW4387515956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.