Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37818194›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2023

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for anesthetic induction and non-ICU sedation.

Kuo-Chuan Hung, Jen-Yin Chen, Shao-Chun Wu, Po-Yu Huang, Jheng-Yan Wu, Ting-Hui Liu, Chien-Cheng Liu, I-Wen Chen, Cheuk-Kwan Sun

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of CiprofolCurrent medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kuo-Chuan HungSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Jen-Yin ChenSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Shao-Chun WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Po-Yu HuangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Jheng-Yan WuDepartment of Nutrition, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Ting-Hui LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chien-Cheng LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
I-Wen Chen *Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Cheuk-Kwan Sun *Department of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Dachang Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chi Mei Medical Center · TWChang Gung University · TWE-Da Hospital · TWI-Shou University · TWNational Sun Yat-sen University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

anesthetic inductionciprofolmeta-analysispropofolsedation

Identifiers

PMID37818194
PMCPMC10561285
OpenAlexW4387058909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.