Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37818148›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hearing2023

Audiological Tests Used in the Evaluation of the Effects of Solvents on the Human Auditory System: A Mixed Methods Review.

Simone Mariotti Roggia, Fernanda Zucki, Adrian Fuente, Adriana Bender Moreira de Lacerda, Wei Gong, Krystin Carlson, Thais C Morata

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hearing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Approaches to managing ototoxicity in the workplace.International journal of audiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Simone Mariotti RoggiaDepartment of Audiology and Speech Therapy, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil.
Fernanda ZuckiDepartment of Audiology and Speech Therapy, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil.
Adrian FuenteÉcole d'Orthophonie et d'Audiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Adriana Bender Moreira de LacerdaÉcole d'Orthophonie et d'Audiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Wei GongDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Krystin CarlsonDivision of Science Integration, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Thais C MorataDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal · CAUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to scope the literature, identify knowledge gaps, appraise results, and synthesize the evidence on the audiological evaluation of workers exposed to solvents. We searched Medline, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and NIOSHTIC-2 up to March 22, 2021. Using Covidence, two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias, and extracted data. National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tools was used in the quality evaluation of included studies; the Downs and Black checklist was used to assess the risk of bias. Of 454 located references, 37 were included. Twenty-five tests were studied: two tests to measure hearing thresholds, one test to measure word recognition in quiet, six electroacoustic procedures, four electrophysiological tests, and twelve behavioral tests to assess auditory processing skills. Two studies used the Amsterdam Inventory for Auditory Disability and Handicap. The quality of individual studies was mostly considered moderate, but the overall quality of evidence was considered low. The discrepancies between studies and differences in the methodologies/outcomes prevent recommending a specific test battery to assess the auditory effects of occupational solvents. Decisions on audiological tests for patients with a history of solvent exposures require the integration of the most current research evidence with clinical expertise and stakeholder perspectives.

Indexed as

ototoxicityscoping reviewsolventswork-related hearing loss

Identifiers

PMID37818148
PMCPMC10562058
OpenAlexW4384942741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.