ArticleDEN open2024
Clinical outcome of patients treated with endoscopic decompression after failure of detorsion for uncomplicated sigmoid volvulus.
Article in DEN open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Outcomes After Failed Endoscopic Detorsion for Sigmoid Volvulus: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.DEN open · 2027Article
- Epidemiology and Recurrence of Sigmoid Volvulus: Analysis of Health Insurance Claims Data in Japan.DEN open · 2026Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Derotation in Colonic Volvulus Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Two decades of endoscopic detorsion in sigmoid volvulus: prognostic factors for failure.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic treatment is the first-line therapy for uncomplicated sigmoid volvulus (SV). However, there are few reports on the clinical course of SV. We investigated the clinical courses of successful and unsuccessful endoscopic detorsions for bowel decompression in patients with uncomplicated SV. Methods: Between May 2009 and February 2022, patients with uncomplicated SV who underwent endoscopic detorsion or decompression only if detorsion failed were enrolled. A case analysis (all cases) and a patient analysis (first episode cases) were performed. Outcomes were compared between the detorsion and decompression groups, including length of hospital stay, recurrence rate, and days to readmission due to SV. Results: Seventy patients were included in this study. The success rate of endoscopic detorsion of the SV was 28.6%. There were no differences in age, sex, or other characteristics between the two groups. The hospital stay tended to be longer in the decompression group than in the detorsion group. However, there was no difference in the 30-day, 6-month, or 12-month recurrence rate or the number of days to readmission for SV between the two groups in the case and patient analyses. Conclusions: This study suggests that endoscopic decompression is a feasible alternative to endoscopic detorsion in patients with uncomplicated SV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.