Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37818076›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023

Investigating novel biomarkers in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma: in silico analysis and clinical specimens validation via RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry.

Jie Li, Faiqah Ramzan, Guiping Zhong

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jie LiHealth Management Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University Haikou 570311, Hainan, China.
Faiqah RamzanGomal Center of Bio-Chemistry and Biotechnology (GCBB), Gomal University Dera Ismail Khan 29050, Pakistan.
Guiping ZhongHealth Management Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University Haikou 570311, Hainan, China.
Hainan Medical University · CNGomal University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising incidence and mortality rate of Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (UCEC) pose significant health concerns. CC and CXC chemokines have been linked to tumorigenesis and cancer progression. Recognizing the growing significance of CC and CXC chemokines' diagnostic and prognostic significance in diverse cancer types, our objective was to comprehensively analyze the diagnostic and prognostic values of hub genes from the CC and CXC chemokines in UCEC, utilizing both in silico and clinical samples and cell lines-based approaches. In silico analyses include STRING, Cytoscape, Cytohubba, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets analysis via the UALCAN, GEPIA, OncoDB, and MuTarget, SurvivalGenie, MEXPRESS, cBioPoratal, TIMER, ENCORI, and DrugBank. Meanwhile, clinical samples and cell lines based analyses include Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), targeted bisulfite sequencing (bisulfite-seq) analysis, and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Through present study, we identified CCL25 (CC motif chemokine ligand 25), CXCL10 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10), CXCL12 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12), and CXCL16 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 16) as crucial hub genes among the CC and CXC chemokines. Analyzing the expression data from TCGA, we observed a significant up-regulation of CCL25, CXCL10, and CXCL16 in UCEC samples compared to controls. In contrast, we noted a significant down-regulation of CXCL12 expression in UCEC samples. On clinical UCEC samples and cell lines analysis, the significant higher expression of CCL25, CXCL10, and CXCL16 and significant lower expression of CXCL12 were also denoted in UCEC samples than the controls via RT-qPCR and IHC analyses. Moreover, in silico analysis also confirmed the abnormal promoter methylation levels of the hub genes in TCGA UCEC samples, which was later validated by the clinical samples using targeted based bisulfite-seq analysis. In addition, various additional aspects of the CCL25, CXCL10, CXCL12, and CXCL16 have also been uncovered in UCEC during the present study. Our findings offer novel insights that contribute to the clinical utility of CCL25, CXCL10, CXCL12, and CXCL16 chemokines as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in UCEC.

Indexed as

biomarkersCC and CXC chemokinesUCEC

Identifiers

PMID37818076
PMCPMC10560950
OpenAlexW4387516050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.