Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37818068›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023

Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery improves cosmetic outcomes without increasing recurrence risk compared to modified radical mastectomy in early breast cancer patients: development and validation of a recurrence risk prediction model.

Yong Xu, Jiyao Cao, Ke Gong, Shengyun Li, Youzhong Liu, Fang Xiong, Yuejun Pan, Mingtao Chen, Jia Gong, Na Luo and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yong XuDepartment of Breast and Nail Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changde City Changde 415000, Hunan, China.
Jiyao CaoDepartment of Breast and Nail Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changde City Changde 415000, Hunan, China.
Ke GongDepartment of Breast and Nail Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changde City Changde 415000, Hunan, China.
Shengyun LiDepartment of Breast and Nail Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changde City Changde 415000, Hunan, China.
Youzhong LiuDepartment of Breast and Nail Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changde City Changde 415000, Hunan, China.
Fang XiongDepartment of Breast and Nail Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changde City Changde 415000, Hunan, China.
Yuejun PanDepartment of Breast and Nail Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changde City Changde 415000, Hunan, China.
Mingtao ChenDepartment of Breast and Nail Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changde City Changde 415000, Hunan, China.
Jia GongDepartment of Breast and Nail Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changde City Changde 415000, Hunan, China.
Na LuoDepartment of Breast and Nail Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changde City Changde 415000, Hunan, China.
Songlin YuanDepartment of Breast and Nail Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changde City Changde 415000, Hunan, China.
The First People's Hospital of Changde · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the quest for effective treatment of early-stage breast cancer, this study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS). Breast cancer remains a major health concern globally, where early detection and effective treatment strategies are crucial for improving the outcomes of patients. MRM and OBCS are two primary treatment modalities for breast cancer, each with its distinct benefits and challenges. Through a retrospective analysis, we found that although the patients in the OBCS group experienced a longer operation time, they had significantly less intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, and hospitalization time compared to the MRM group. Furthermore, patients in the OBCS group demonstrated higher subjective satisfaction and quality of life scores, along with better objective outcomes. In terms of postoperative complications and recurrence rates, no significant difference was identified between the two groups. However, our multivariate Cox regression analysis identified lymph node metastasis and molecular type as independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS). Subsequently, we constructed a risk model based on these variables, which was proven to be effective in predicting recurrence, with an area under the risk score curve for recurrence prediction being 0.852. The group with a lower risk score demonstrated a significantly higher DFS rate. Our study suggests that compared with MRM, OBCS can significantly reduce surgical incision, improve patient satisfaction, and does not increase the risk of complications or recurrence. Our risk model, developed using Cox regression, also demonstrated high clinical value in predicting breast cancer recurrence, thereby aiding in personalized patient management and treatment planning.

Indexed as

early breast cancerModified radical mastectomyoncoplastic breast-conserving surgeryrecurrencerisk model

Identifiers

PMID37818068
PMCPMC10560934
OpenAlexW4387515933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.