Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37818027›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2023

18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-2-d-glucose PET-CT (FDG PET-CT) in staging of high-risk renal and urothelial bladder cancers (COPPER-T) trial protocol.

Rahul Jena, Priyank Bhargava, Shashank Tripathi, Sameer Taywade, Taruna Yadav, Arjun Singh Sandhu, Mahendra Singh, Shiv Charan Navriya, Deepak Prakash Bhirud, Amit Aggarwal and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rahul JenaDepartment of Urology All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0952-7514
Priyank BhargavaDepartment of Urology All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1579-6681
Shashank TripathiDepartment of Urology All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur India.
Sameer TaywadeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur India.
Taruna YadavDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur India.
Arjun Singh SandhuDepartment of Urology All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur India.
Mahendra SinghDepartment of Urology All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur India.
Shiv Charan NavriyaDepartment of Urology All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur India.
Deepak Prakash BhirudDepartment of Urology All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur India.
Amit AggarwalDepartment of Urology All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur India.
Gautam Ram ChoudharyDepartment of Urology All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Study Design: Role of Patients and Methods: There will be two subgroups of patients: RCC and urinary bladder carcinoma. In each of these, the patients will be randomized to either Arm A or Arm B. In each of the arms, each patient will be subjected to diagnostic imaging by FDG PET-CT. The CT scan will be a contrast-enhanced scan like that in conventional staging. A radiologist and nuclear medicine specialist will report the scan independently. The radiologist will not have access to the PET scan sequences and will only review the contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images. In Arm A, the report of the conventional imaging modality, that is, CECT and bone scan if done, will be reviewed first by the clinician, and based on this report, a management plan will be made. Then, the PET-CT report will be reviewed, and change in the management plan will be noted. New findings or equivocal findings if any in the PET-CT report would be noted. In Arm B, the report of the PET-CT report will be reviewed first by the clinicians, and a management plan will be made. Then, the CECT and/or bone scan reports will be reviewed, and any change in the management plan will be noted. Outcome and Significance: Final analysis of the data after completion of the trial will help in clarifying the role of FDG PET-CT in high risk RCC and transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder, its diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional imaging and the impact of using it on patient management.

Indexed as

bladder cancerconventional imagingFDG PET‐CThigh risk urothelial cancerrandomized trialrenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37818027
PMCPMC10560619
OpenAlexW4376139873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.