Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37817905›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2023

Protein Level Quantification Across Fluorescence-based Platforms.

Hector Romero, Annika Schmidt, Cristina M Cardoso

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hector RomeroDepartment of Biology, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Annika SchmidtDepartment of Biology, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Cristina M CardosoDepartment of Biology, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Technical University of Darmstadt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological processes are dependent on protein concentration and there is an inherent variability among cells even in environment-controlled conditions. Determining the amount of protein of interest in a cell is relevant to quantitatively relate it with the cells (patho)physiology. Previous studies used either western blot to determine the average amount of protein per cell in a population or fluorescence intensity to provide a relative amount of protein. This method combines both techniques. First, the protein of interest is purified, and its concentration determined. Next, cells containing the protein of interest with a fluorescent tag are sorted into different levels of intensity using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and the amount of protein for each intensity category is calculated using the purified protein as calibration. Lastly, a calibration curve allows the direct relation of the amount of protein to the intensity levels determined with any instrument able to measure intensity levels. Once a fluorescence-based instrument is calibrated, it is possible to determine protein concentrations based on intensity. Key features • This method allows the evaluation and comparison of protein concentration in cells based on fluorescence intensity. • Requires protein purification and fluorescence-activated cell sorting. • Once calibrated for one protein, it allows determination of the levels of this protein using any fluorescence-based instrument. • Allows to determine subcellular local protein concentration based on combining volumetric and intensity measurements.

Indexed as

FACSFluorescenceMicroscopyQuantificationSingle-cell protein levelsWestern blotting

Identifiers

PMID37817905
PMCPMC10560694
OpenAlexW4387384455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.