Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37817881›Full record

ArticleHardwareX2023

Multimodal fluorescence microscope with fast adaptive polarimetry.

Berta Martínez-Prat, Oriol Arteaga, Francesc Sagués, Jordi Ignés-Mullol

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HardwareX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Berta Martínez-PratUniversitat de Barcelona and Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (IN2UB), Martíi Franquès 1, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Oriol ArteagaUniversitat de Barcelona and Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (IN2UB), Martíi Franquès 1, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesc SaguésUniversitat de Barcelona and Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (IN2UB), Martíi Franquès 1, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi Ignés-MullolUniversitat de Barcelona and Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (IN2UB), Martíi Franquès 1, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Institut de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia de la Universitat de Barcelona

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polarized light microscopy is a widely used technique to observe specimens that are optically anisotropic, or birefringent. It has a broad applicability in the study of minerals, soft materials such as polymers, complex fluids or liquid crystals, and organic tissues in biology and medicine. Most of these observations are qualitative in nature, as it is not obvious to quantify the spatial distribution of optical anisotropy of specimens. Moreover, existing commercial implementations for quantitative polarimetry are costly and slow in nature, precluding real time observation of dynamical processes. Here, we present a custom-made implementation of an optical microscope for quantitative polarimetry at the cost of a standard scientific polarizing microscope. The instrument allows to extract the local optical axis and birefringence of transparent materials with a frequency of several Hz. The instrument is built using off-the-shelf optomechanical components, which optimizes cost, availability, and modularity. An example of the latter is the fact that we combine the polarimetry measurements with simultaneous fluorescence microscopy, which results in a powerful multimodal instrument with broad potential applications.

Indexed as

AnisotropyBirefringenceFluorescence microscopyOptical microscopy

Identifiers

PMID37817881
PMCPMC10560837
OpenAlexW4387095274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.